This is our published view
The bench stands behind it
For your facts, in confidence, put the question to the firm.
The bench stands behind it
The position
A Qualified Investor Fund is the lightest-touch domestic fund the ADGM FSRA regime offers, and it is defined less by what it requires than by what it removes.
A Qualified Investor Fund is the lightest-touch domestic fund the ADGM FSRA regime offers, and it is defined less by what it requires than by what it removes. The classification gate in Rule 3.3.4 is short: units offered only by private placement, every unitholder a Professional Client, and an initial subscription of at least US$500,000. Once a fund clears that gate, the Fund Rules withdraw most of the detailed obligations that bind Public and Exempt Funds. The operative content of the regime sits in three disapplication lists, in Rules 11.1.1(2), 12.1.1(3) and the appendix and reporting reliefs, and in the short chapter that governs the fund directly, Chapter 15.
For the questions that decide investor outcomes in a private-capital vehicle, fee mechanics, valuation governance, performance-fee crystallisation and clawback, the Fund Rules impose no prescriptive control on a Qualified Investor Fund. The rules that carry those controls for other fund types are switched off. What remains is a general management duty, a principles-based disclosure standard, one surviving valuation obligation, and a negative constraint on the fund’s Constitution. Investor protection in a Qualified Investor Fund is therefore disclosure-based and contractual, negotiated between the manager and its Professional Client investors, rather than prescribed by the rulebook.
Rule 3.3.4(1) sets three conditions for a Domestic Fund to be a Qualified Investor Fund: its units are offered only by private placement; all unitholders meet the criteria to be Professional Clients; and the initial subscription to become a unitholder is “at least US$500,000.” The structure mirrors the Exempt Fund gate in Rule 3.3.3, which is identical except that the subscription floor is US$50,000. The tenfold difference in the subscription floor is the price of the lighter regime.
The gate is a continuing condition, not a one-off test. Rule 15.1.2(1) requires the fund to meet the Rule 3.3.4 conditions “at the inception of the Fund and on an on-going basis,” and Rule 15.1.2(4) requires the manager, as soon as it becomes aware that the fund no longer meets or is likely not to meet those conditions, to commence winding up or reconstitution and to notify the Regulator. Rule 3.3.5 preserves classification where a non-qualifying person becomes a unitholder by inheritance or by legal action, and only in those two cases.
Chapter 12, which sets out the detailed management obligations of a fund manager, applies to a fund “except as provided” in Rule 12.1.1(3). For a Qualified Investor Fund, Rule 12.1.1(3) provides that “only” a named subset applies: Rules 12.2, 12.3.1 to 12.3.6, 12.3.7(b), 12.3.8 to 12.3.10, 12.3.12(1), 12.4.1(b), 12.10.1, and the Guidance to Rule 12.12.2. Everything in Chapter 12 outside that list is disapplied. The disapplied material includes the whole of Rule 12.5 (determination of single price), Rule 12.6 (suspension of dealings), and, of central importance below, the whole of Rule 12.13 (fees, charges and other levies) and almost all of Rule 12.4 (valuation of Fund Property).
Chapter 11, on the constitution of a fund, applies to a Qualified Investor Fund only as to Rules 11.1.2(1)(a), (c), (d) and (e), 11.1.3(1)(b), 11.1.3(2) and 11.1.5, by Rule 11.1.1(2). Two omissions from that list matter. Rule 11.1.2(1)(f), which requires an open-ended fund to use single pricing by reference to net asset value, does not apply to a Qualified Investor Fund. Rule 11.1.3(1)(a), which requires the Constitution to contain the statements prescribed in Appendix 5, does not apply either, and Appendix 5 is separately confirmed as not applicable to a Qualified Investor Fund in the applicability table in Rule 3.4. The prescribed constitutional contents that shape a Public or Exempt Fund’s governing document are absent for a Qualified Investor Fund.
Appendix 4, the guidance on asset valuation and pricing, does not apply to a Qualified Investor Fund on the same table. Chapter 16, on accounting, audit and periodic reporting, does apply, but with reliefs: the interim-report rules do not apply unless there has been a material change in the interim period, a comparative table in the annual report is not required, and Rules 16.3.8 and 16.4.5(a) and (b) need not be complied with where a waiver is obtained under Rule 16.3.9. A Qualified Investor Fund remains subject to the core requirement to prepare audited annual financial statements under IFRS or US GAAP as supplemented by the SORP, under Rule 16.2.
The control that governs fees and performance fees for other fund types is Rule 12.13, and it is disapplied in full for a Qualified Investor Fund. Rule 12.13.2(1) requires that no payment be made to the manager out of Fund Property unless permitted by the Constitution and unless the Prospectus specifies how it is calculated, accrued, when it is paid, and the maximum and current rates. Rule 12.13.5 requires that no performance fee be paid out of Fund Property unless permitted by the Constitution and specified in the Prospectus. Rule 12.13.3 requires 90 days’ notice and a Special Resolution of unitholders before a new category of remuneration is introduced. None of these binds a Qualified Investor Fund.
The consequence is that the Fund Rules impose no prescriptive discipline on performance-fee design in a Qualified Investor Fund. There is no rulebook requirement for a high-water mark, no rulebook limit on crystallisation, and no rulebook clawback. Whether the fee crystallises annually or on realisation, whether it is charged on unrealised as well as realised gains, and whether a clawback operates if a crystallised gain later reverses, are left by the rulebook to the fund’s own documents.
That gap is most acute where the fund is illiquid and holds assets whose value is not set by a market. A performance fee that crystallises on an unrealised valuation, in a vehicle where the manager influences that valuation and no clawback follows a later reversal, is the structure most exposed by the absence of a rulebook control. The rulebook does not prevent it. The discipline, if there is to be any, comes from the residual obligations described below and from what the Professional Client investors negotiate into the Constitution and Prospectus.
Of the valuation obligations in Rule 12.4, only Rule 12.4.1(b) survives for a Qualified Investor Fund. That paragraph requires the manager to ensure that Fund Property is valued “at regular intervals as appropriate to the nature of the Fund, market practice and investor expectations,” and in accordance with the valuation procedures in the Constitution or Prospectus, except where valuation is suspended on terms set out in those documents.
The valuation obligations that do not survive are the substance of the valuation regime. Rule 12.4.1(a), requiring comprehensive and documented valuation policies and procedures, does not apply. Rule 12.4.1(d), requiring publication of the unit price to unitholders and prospective unitholders, does not apply. Rule 12.4.2(1)(b), the express duty not to do or omit anything reasonably likely to confer on the manager a benefit or advantage at the expense of a unitholder, does not apply, and neither does the valuation-error correction and reimbursement duty in Rule 12.4.2(2). Determination of a single price under Rule 12.5 does not apply. Appendix 4 does not apply.
For the crystallisation question this is the load-bearing point. The one duty in the regime that speaks directly to a manager taking value at a unitholder’s expense, Rule 12.4.2(1)(b), is among the disapplied provisions. A Qualified Investor Fund manager valuing its own fund’s illiquid assets, on a basis that drives its own performance fee, is not subject to that specific prohibition. The surviving valuation duty in Rule 12.4.1(b) is calibrated to “the nature of the Fund, market practice and investor expectations,” a standard that accommodates infrequent and manager-determined valuation rather than constraining it.
Four residual sources of discipline survive for a Qualified Investor Fund, and each is general rather than prescriptive.
First, Rule 12.2 continues to apply. The manager must manage the fund in accordance with its Constitution and most recent Prospectus and perform the functions conferred on it by the Constitution, the Rules and FSMR. The Chapter 15 guidance directs the manager to the overarching duties, and points beyond FUNDS to the Principles for Authorised Persons in GEN Section 2.2 and the systems-and-controls requirements in GEN Chapter 3.
Second, Rule 9.5.2 continues to apply to the offering document. It requires the Prospectus of a Qualified Investor Fund to include “all the information which Professional Clients to whom it intends to Offer Units of the Fund would reasonably require and expect to find in such a Prospectus.” This is a principles-based standard, not the itemised fee disclosure that Rule 12.13.2 prescribes for other funds. It carries fee and valuation disclosure into a Qualified Investor Fund only to the extent a Professional Client would reasonably expect it, and it leaves the sufficiency of any given disclosure to judgement rather than to a checklist. The mandatory high-fees warning in Rule 9.5.4 is confined by its own words to Exempt Funds and does not bind a Qualified Investor Fund, notwithstanding the way the summary table in Rule 3.4 reads.
Third, Rule 11.1.3(1)(b) survives. The Constitution must not contain “any provision that is prejudicial to the interests of the Unitholders generally or to the Unitholders of any class of Units.” This is the one place in the surviving rulebook that could bear on an aggressive fee or valuation term. Whether a particular crystallisation-without-clawback provision would be prejudicial within Rule 11.1.3(1)(b) is a question the rulebook leaves open; reading that standard onto a specific fee term is an inference about how a general test would apply, and it is not something the text resolves.
Fourth, the custody and audit floor holds. Rule 15.3.1 requires the manager of a Qualified Investor Fund that is not an Investment Trust to register legal title to Fund Property with an Eligible Custodian, subject to the carve-out in Rule 15.3.1(2) where that is impracticable and disproportionate and effective insolvency-protection arrangements are in place. The Chapter 16 audited-accounts requirement holds, with the reliefs noted above.
The disapplication architecture is settled: it is set out expressly in Rules 3.3.4, 11.1.1(2), 12.1.1(3), 15.1 to 15.3, and the Rule 3.4 table, all in FUNDS VER12.290426. The conclusion that fee mechanics, crystallisation and clawback are unconstrained by the Fund Rules for a Qualified Investor Fund follows directly from the disapplication of Rules 12.13 and most of 12.4, and is settled on the text.
What is open is the reach of the residual standards. How Rule 11.1.3(1)(b) would treat a specific fee or valuation term, and what a Professional Client “would reasonably require and expect” under Rule 9.5.2 in a given fund, are matters the text frames but does not decide. The obligations that the Chapter 15 guidance draws from GEN Section 2.2 and GEN Chapter 3 sit outside FUNDS and are stated here as referenced rather than verified against the GEN rulebook. The interaction with FSMR as the parent legislation is likewise not resolved on the FUNDS text alone.
A change is also in prospect. Consultation Paper No. 12 of 2025, dated 24 November 2025, proposes an Institutional Fund Manager framework under which a Qualified Investor Fund managed by such a manager would carry a minimum subscription of US$5 million and would admit no natural-person unitholders, and an Employee Investment Vehicle exclusion that would let a manager’s front-office staff invest in a Qualified Investor Fund without meeting the standard subscription and client-classification criteria. The FSRA has stated that the draft amendments accompanying that paper are indicative and are not to be acted on until enacted, and none is reflected in VER12.290426. A second consultation paper affecting the funds framework is planned for 2026. This analysis states the current rules and will require review when those amendments are enacted.
For your facts, in confidence, put the question to the firm.
The bench stands behind it