General Corporate & Commercial Legal Services for Crypto & Fintech in the UAE

Legal Experts

Picture of Nikolas Kairis
Nikolas Kairis

Senior Partner - Financial Markets and Digital Assets

Picture of Ghassan Makki
Ghassan Makki

Founder and Managing Partner - Financial Markets and Digital Assets

Picture of Fahad Al Howdari

Fahad Al Howdari

Principal Advocate - Litigation (UAE)

Table of Contents

What legal steps are needed to structure a crypto or fintech business in the UAE?

Structuring a crypto or fintech business in the UAE requires careful upfront planning to align with the country’s regulatory framework. The first step is choosing where to incorporate and license the business. The UAE offers multiple jurisdictions: the mainland (onshore UAE under federal law) and various free zones like ADGM in Abu Dhabi, DIFC in Dubai, DMCC in Dubai, and others. Each has its own regulations for fintech and crypto. A key legal consideration is that operating any crypto-related business without a license is illegal in the UAE Federal law (via the SCA and Central Bank) as well as emirate-level regulators have made it clear that activities such as crypto trading, exchange services, or even crypto brokerage cannot be done in an unregulated manner. Therefore, the foundational step is to determine under which regulator your business model falls and obtain the necessary approval.

 

For example, if you plan to run a crypto exchange targeting retail customers in Dubai, you would likely incorporate a company in Dubai and apply for a license from VARA (the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority). This involves preparing incorporation documents, renting an office (as required by Dubai’s commercial laws), and drafting a detailed business plan and compliance policies to submit with the license application. VARA will review the shareholders, directors, and the business model for fitness and propriety. On the other hand, if your business is more of a fintech (like a payments app or a crypto wallet service) that doesn’t involve onshore Dubai customers, you might consider ADGM or DIFC, which have comprehensive fintech regimes. In ADGM, for instance, you’d register an ADGM company (which can be 100% foreign-owned) and then go through the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) to get an appropriate license (such as providing custody or operating a multilateral trading facility). Free zones like ADGM and DIFC operate under English common law principles and often simplify corporate formation – you can set up a company relatively quickly with share capital that meets the regulator’s minimum requirements. They also allow flexibility in ownership structuring, which is helpful if you have foreign investors or plan to allocate shares to venture capital funds.

 

Another part of structuring is choosing the legal entity form and corporate structure. Traditional choices are a private limited company (Ltd) in free zones or a mainland LLC. In free zones, you typically don’t need a local Emirati partner (unlike some mainland entities in the past), so you can maintain full control. 

 

Corporate structuring may also involve setting up a holding company vs an operating company. Some crypto entrepreneurs set up an offshore holding (in a jurisdiction like the BVI or Cayman Islands) to hold intellectual property or tokens, and then an onshore UAE entity to conduct operations. This can be for tax optimization or to cater to international investors who prefer offshore vehicles. However, one must be mindful that the UAE now has economic substance regulations and a new corporate tax for mainland companies, so where value is created might attract taxes if not structured properly (though most free zone financial entities remain tax-free on local income as of now).

 

Legal services during this structuring phase will include drafting the Memorandum of Association (MoA) or Articles of the company to ensure it has the objects to conduct crypto business, preparing shareholder agreements if there are multiple founders or investors, and ensuring compliance with any ownership restrictions.

 

Notably, free zones like DIFC and ADGM have no nationality restrictions on ownership (you can have 100% foreign ownership easily ), and no restrictions on capital repatriation or hiring foreign talent , which greatly simplifies structuring for a crypto startup – you can bring in expatriate experts and send profits abroad without government approvals. These advantages mean many crypto and fintech startups opt for free zones to incorporate.

 

Finally, when structuring a crypto business, one must address how the crypto- specific operations fit into the legal entity. If the company plans to issue a token, for example, lawyers might advise creating a separate entity (like a foundation) for the token issuance to ring-fence liabilities. If the business involves both fiat and crypto handling, sometimes two entities are created – one to get a traditional payment license from the Central Bank (for fiat money services) and another to get the crypto license (from VARA/SCA). The two then sign service agreements between them. This kind of structure can ensure that each entity is compliant within its domain. In summary, the legal steps include: selecting the right jurisdiction and license, incorporating the company with appropriate constitutional documents, obtaining regulatory approval, and structuring any additional entities or contractual arrangements needed for the business model. Engaging a law firm with UAE fintech experience is crucial at this stage – they will help prepare the license applications, interface with regulators, draft all needed documents, and basically project-manage the establishment of the business so that from day one, the company is on solid legal footing.



What are the corporate governance requirements and operational challenges in the UAE crypto space?

Running a crypto or fintech business in the UAE comes with strict corporate governance requirements, especially once you are licensed. Regulators like VARA (Dubai) and FSRA (ADGM) expect a high level of governance akin to that of a bank or traditional financial institution. One fundamental requirement is having a clear company ownership and management structure. VARA’s rulebook, for instance, requires that a crypto company’s structure be transparent with an identifiable chain of owners and “Ultimate Beneficial Owners” (UBOs) to facilitate effective oversight.

In practice, this means you must disclose all significant shareholders (often anyone owning 25% or more) and any parent companies up the chain, and you can’t obscure control through complex nominee arrangements without informing VARA.

 

Additionally, VARA mandates that the crypto business be a UAE legal entity (incorporated in Dubai) – you cannot operate a Dubai crypto venture as an overseas company branch or a DAO without a legal entity. Even novel structures like DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations) are addressed: if a company’s governance involves a DAO or similar, VARA will require explanation of how decisions are made and compliance ensured in such a setup.

 

Governance also extends to board and management appointments. Typically, crypto companies must have certain mandated officers. For example, ADGM’s FSRA and the DFSA in DIFC require an Senior Executive Officer (SEO), who is essentially the CEO responsible for daily operations and must be resident in the UAE. They also require a Compliance Officer and a Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) – these roles can sometimes be the same person or outsourced, but the individuals must be approved by the regulator and usually need to be UAE-based. These officers are responsible for ensuring the firm follows all rules and for reporting to regulators. The Senior Executive Officer often has to have a certain number of years of relevant experience (ADGM, for instance, looks for ~10 years of financial or crypto industry experience for the SEO role). Corporate governance guidelines also insist on segregation of duties – the person trading or managing funds shouldn’t be the same person reconciling accounts, for example. Regulators may require an independent director or at least a non-executive director on the board to provide oversight (ADGM encourages a non-executive chairman for instance ).

 

Operationally, one challenge is meeting the continuous compliance and reporting obligations that come with the license. UAE regulators require regular reports – VARA might ask for quarterly compliance reports, and the Central Bank (if applicable) for monthly transaction reports. Audits are frequent: financial audits yearly, and often specialized audits like IT security audits. For example, ADGM mandates annual IT system audits by independent experts for exchanges to ensure cybersecurity and continuity plans are solid. From a governance perspective, this means the company must maintain proper records and internal controls. Crypto firms have to implement internal policies covering everything from employee trading (to prevent conflicts of interest) to disclosure of wallet addresses used for company funds.

 

Another operational challenge in the crypto space is keeping up with evolving regulations. The UAE is proactive in updating its rules as the industry changes. A crypto company’s board and legal counsel must stay on top of new VARA rulebook updates or Central Bank notices. For instance, if VARA issues a new rule prohibiting a certain high-risk token or a new marketing guideline (like the content of crypto ads) , the company needs to quickly adapt its operations and policies. Corporate governance bodies (the board or a compliance committee) need to incorporate these changes into strategy promptly. This requires that governance is not just a check- box, but an active process – many firms hold quarterly board meetings specifically to review compliance updates.

 

Additionally, governance in a crypto firm includes risk management for assets. Crypto is volatile, so if the company holds customers’ assets, it must have robust custodial arrangements, insurance if possible, and clear rules on segregation of client assets vs the company’s own funds. Regulators like the DFSA require that custody of crypto assets is handled with specific safeguards and that client assets are not commingled. Implementing this operationally might involve using third-party custodians or multi-signature wallets with board oversight on withdrawals.

 

Finally, there’s the challenge of human capital and culture. Governance is only as effective as the people running the company. In the UAE crypto sector, there’s competition for qualified compliance officers and knowledgeable directors who understand both finance and crypto. Companies often need to invest in training for their staff about UAE regulations and foster a culture where compliance is everyone’s responsibility. Unlike some other industries, a lapse in a crypto company (say, processing a transaction for a sanctioned person or a big AML failure) can lead not only to fines but potentially loss of license or even criminal liability for senior managers. So, from day one, setting a tone at the top that prioritizes good governance is critical.

In summary, corporate governance requirements for UAE crypto/fintech firms include establishing a transparent company structure, appointing approved and qualified individuals in key roles, instituting rigorous internal controls and policies, and actively managing compliance and risks. The operational challenges revolve around implementing these governance practices daily and keeping pace with regulatory changes – all while running a fast-moving crypto business. Strong legal counsel and experienced compliance professionals are invaluable to meet these challenges.



Professional Legal Services Popup
×

Looking for Expert Legal Services for Crypto & Fintech in the UAE?

Navigate the complexities of UAE crypto and fintech regulations with our experienced legal team. Contact us today!

How do licensing and regulatory compliance differ across VARA, ADGM, DIFC, and DMCC for crypto businesses?

Key UAE crypto regulators include the national Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA), Abu Dhabi’s FSRA (ADGM), Dubai’s VARA, and the DIFC’s DFSA.

The UAE’s crypto regulatory landscape is multi-layered, and the approach to licensing/compliance can vary significantly by jurisdiction:

 

 

  • VARA (Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority): VARA regulates crypto businesses in onshore Dubai (outside of financial free zones). It introduced a new regulatory framework in 2022 dedicated entirely to virtual assets. VARA’s regime is quite comprehensive – any activity involving virtual assets (crypto trading platforms, custody, brokerage, lending, etc.) requires a license. VARA has defined several license categories based on the nature of
    services (for example, Advisory, Broker-Dealer, Custody, Exchange, Lending & Borrowing, Payment & Remittance, Investment & Management services). Each category has specific requirements and fee structures. Uniquely, VARA mandates compliance with a set of Compulsory Rulebooks (covering general business governance, risk & compliance, technology, and market conduct) plus Activity-Specific Rulebooks relevant to the license. For instance, an exchange would need to follow the Exchange Rulebook in addition to the general ones. VARA also actively polices marketing – any crypto business (even unlicensed ones) must follow VARA’s Marketing and Promotions regulations when targeting Dubai users. In terms of process: to get a VARA license, one applies through Dubai’s Department of Economy (the commercial licensing authority) and simultaneously undergoes VARA ’s vetting. VARA will check the fit and proper status of directors and shareholders , the robustness of the business plan, AML policies, and technological systems. Only once VARA is satisfied does the company get the final commercial license to operate. Compliance under VARA is ongoing – they can conduct inspections and have shown they will enforce rules strictly (e.g., the BitOasis suspension case earlier). In short, VARA’s approach is a bespoke crypto regulatory system, with detailed rules and higher initial costs, but it provides legal clarity for virtually all types of crypto operations in Dubai.
  • ADGM (Abu Dhabi Global Market – FSRA): ADGM was a pioneer with its crypto asset framework launched in 2018. The FSRA (Financial Services Regulatory Authority) oversees licensing of crypto asset activities in ADGM. Rather than having separate crypto licenses per se, ADGM fits crypto businesses into its existing Financial Services Permissions categories (with some tailoring). For example, a crypto exchange in ADGM would be licensed as a Multilateral Trading Facility (MTF) or broker-dealer under the FSRA, with special provisions applied for virtual assets. The FSRA issued Guidance on Crypto Asset Activities to define how crypto fits into categories like dealing, custody, operating exchanges, etc.. One distinguishing factor: ADGM categorizes crypto assets into types – e.g., “virtual assets” (which are treated similarly to commodities or commodities derivatives) versus “digital securities” (tokens that are akin to securities or shares). If something is a digital security, traditional securities regulations apply; if just a virtual asset (like Bitcoin), then the crypto-specific framework applies. The licensing in ADGM often requires significant base capital (for instance, an exchange must have at least $250k or more in capital depending on scope) and stringent operational conditions. ADGM also requires that certain senior staff (SEO, Finance Officer, Compliance Officer) reside in the UAE and dedicate full-time attention. Compliance in ADGM is very much aligned with international standards – FSRA expects adherence to FATF AML rules, and they were among the first to implement the Travel Rule for VASPs. ADGM is also open to innovation like DeFi and STOs (Security Token Offerings) but deals with them on a case-
    by-case “sandbox” or specific guidance basis. Overall, ADGM’s regulatory compliance is rigorous but perhaps slightly more flexible on a case-by-case basis than VARA because ADGM has years of experience now adjusting its framework (for example, ADGM has updated its crypto guidance multiple times between 2018 and 2023 to refine definitions and requirements).
  • DIFC (Dubai International Financial Centre – DFSA): DIFC’s DFSA took a more cautious, phased approach. Initially, the DFSA only allowed Investment Tokens (essentially tokenized securities or derivatives) and explicitly stated that cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin were not under its remit. In 2022, the DFSA rolled out the second phase, the Crypto Token Regime, which as of late 2022 allows authorized firms to deal in certain crypto tokens (like top cryptocurrencies that meet its criteria). A firm wanting to operate in DIFC has to already be or become an authorized financial institution (for example, as an asset management firm, broker, etc.) and then seek approval to carry out crypto token activities. The DFSA maintains a “Recognised Crypto Tokens” list , which currently includes a handful of major tokens that firms can support. Anything not on the list is effectively prohibited in DIFC. Unlike VARA or ADGM, DIFC does not have separate license categories just for crypto – instead, existing categories (like Money Services, Dealing in Investments as Principal/Agent, etc.) are amended to include crypto tokens. But interestingly, DFSA still bans the use of crypto for certain services; as noted earlier, a Money Service Provider in DIFC cannot use crypto tokens for remittances except maybe certain stablecoins and only for limited purposes. So, DIFC is actually the most restrictive in terms of scope of crypto business: it’s suited for things like crypto asset managers, crypto OTC dealers for institutional clients, or possibly a niche exchange dealing only in approved tokens for accredited investors. The compliance in DIFC is very much about investor protection – heavy disclosure, segregation of client assets, and technology risk management. They even require that any firm dealing in crypto tokens undergo a technology audit and demonstrate robust IT security before launching. Firms also need DFSA approval for marketing any crypto token product. In sum, DIFC is a good base for crypto financial services targeting the institutional market, but it’s not designed for mass-market crypto exchanges or innovative token startups (many of those would go to VARA or ADGM instead).
  • DMCC and Other Free Zones: DMCC (Dubai Multi Commodities Centre) is a bit unique because it is not a financial regulator itself, but it worked out a mechanism with the SCA to allow crypto businesses. Under this, DMCC can issue cryptocurrency trading licenses to projects, particularly proprietary trading firms or blockchain tech companies, and those companies must adhere to SCA’s regulations and any conditions set in the DMCC Crypto Centre framework. DMCC doesn’t supervise financial services like client fund handling – a DMCC crypto license usually will be for activities like prop trading (trading on the company’s own account), developing blockchain software, NFTs, or advisory services. If a DMCC company later wanted to take on customers’ money or trade on behalf of others, it would likely need to transition to an SCA license or VARA license. Still, DMCC has been popular for early-stage crypto startups because the entry barriers (fees, capital) are lower than ADGM/DIFC, and it provides a stepping stone with some regulatory oversight. The compliance expectations are growing: DMCC companies in the crypto space have to, for example, do quarterly AML reports and are subject to audit by DMCC/SCA. They also benefit from DMCC’s support in things like bank account opening, where DMCC sometimes gives letters of introduction to help its member companies. Another up-and-coming free zone is RAK Digital Assets Oasis (RAK DAO), which plans to cater specifically to crypto, NFTs, and DAOs starting in 2024. Each free zone that wants to attract crypto firms is essentially carving out niches – some offer incubation and easier setup (e.g., IFZA or Sharjah’s free zones have started allowing fintech and crypto-related consulting licenses, but not exchange operations). However, none of these commercial free zones can bypass the main regulators; they coordinate with SCA or VARA. So, a startup might start in DMCC for an initial build phase and then graduate to a VARA license when ready to launch to the public.

 

 

In summary, VARA offers a broad, crypto-specific regime (great for exchanges,

lending platforms, etc., but with significant compliance overhead and cost), ADGM (FSRA) offers a comprehensive but more traditional financial licensing approach (with possibly more institutional focus and high standards), DIFC (DFSA) provides a very controlled environment mainly for institutional-oriented crypto services (limited token scope), and DMCC/other free zones provide launch pads under SCA oversight primarily for less sensitive crypto activities or as interim solutions.

 

Businesses often decide based on their needs: if you want to be a major retail exchange in UAE – VARA or ADGM; if you are a proprietary trading desk or blockchain project – DMCC might suffice; if you manage a crypto fund – DIFC or ADGM for the common law and reputation; and so on. Each comes with slightly different compliance nuances, but all require solid AML controls and governance as discussed. The good news is that between these options, almost every crypto business model can find a suitable legal home in the UAE, provided they are willing to comply with the relevant regulator’s framework.

How can crypto or fintech firms secure banking and financial services in the UAE?

Access to banking is a pivotal aspect of operating a fintech or crypto business, and in the UAE it requires strategy and persistence. Traditional banks in the UAE have been cautious with crypto firms, but the environment is improving as regulations mature. For a crypto/fintech firm, the first step is usually to present itself as a well-regulated, transparent business. Banks will typically ask: are you licensed by VARA, SCA, ADGM, or DFSA? A firm that can answer “yes, here’s a copy of our license” is already miles ahead in the banking game. Being regulated gives banks confidence that the business is accountable to a government authority and following AML/KYC rules. For instance, after obtaining a VARA license, several crypto companies reported smoother interactions with banks, as the license serves as a green light that the company isn’t a fly-by-night operation.

 

That said, even licensed companies need to pick their banking partners carefully. Not all banks in the UAE are open to holding accounts for crypto-related funds. Firms often start with banks known for fintech friendliness. Emirates NBD and Commercial Bank of Dubai (CBD) are two large banks that have publicly shown interest in digital assets. Some crypto businesses have also had success with Mashreq Bank and RAKBANK, especially fintech startups, as these banks have divisions focusing on innovation. In fact, RAKBANK has partnered with RAK Digital Assets Oasis to support companies in that free zone , indicating a willingness to bank crypto businesses that are vetted by the free zone. Another avenue is international banks present in UAE – e.g., Standard Chartered (with its crypto custody services) or HSBC – though they tend to cater only to very well-established, higher-capital companies in the sector.

 

When approaching a bank, a crypto/fintech firm should be prepared to explain its business model in plain terms and outline risk mitigation. This often involves educating the bank’s compliance team: explaining how the company screens customers, how it prevents illicit crypto transactions, and how it complies with UAE law (like adhering to the travel rule and sanctions screening). It’s common for banks to request organizational charts, details on any foreign entities in the group, source of funds for initial capital, and projected volumes of transactions. Essentially, the bank wants to ensure that by banking the company, it’s not inadvertently facilitating money laundering or facing undue regulatory risk. Law firms often assist at this juncture by preparing letters or documentation for the client that describe the legal and regulatory status of the business in a way that addresses bank concerns.

Some fintech startups in the UAE bypass traditional banks at the start by using payment institutions or wallets. For example, there are licensed payment service providers in the UAE that can hold client money and provide IBANs for customers without being a full bank (these operate under the Central Bank’s Stored Value Facilities regulations). A crypto brokerage could use such a provider to handle customer fiat flows – the customers pay the provider, which then API-connects to the crypto platform. Companies like YAP or MAGNATI in the UAE provide fintech banking-as-a-service that some startups leverage. However, ultimately most serious businesses will want their own bank account for operational funds and revenue.

It’s also worth noting that building a relationship with the bank is crucial. This might mean regular communication and even inviting the bank’s compliance officers to your office to see how operations work. Demonstrating surplus compliance – e.g., sharing your independent audit reports or introducing your compliance officer to the bank – can alleviate fears. Some crypto firms have had to start with restricted accounts initially (for example, an account that only receives funds but can’t send international transfers until a track record is built) and gradually earn full privileges.

 

Another strategy is to use the fact that free zone authorities can mediate. ADGM and DIFC, for instance, have their own networks and sometimes can facilitate introductions to banks for their member companies. If you are ADGM-licensed, the FSRA and ADGM authority can endorse that you are a reputable company, which helps. The DMCC has also worked with banks to smooth account opening for Crypto Centre companies by verifying to the bank that the company is operating under SCA- approved conditions. Thus, leveraging the reputation of your licensing authority can help in securing banking.

Finally, consider multi-jurisdictional banking. Some UAE crypto companies keep an account in the UAE for local transactions and payroll, but use an account in a crypto-friendly jurisdiction (like Switzerland, Bahrain, or offshore) for larger transactions or crypto liquidity management. As long as this is done transparently and doesn’t violate any UAE laws (and the company reports cross-border transfers properly), this can be a way to ensure redundancy. However, any cross-border movement must respect the UAE’s transfer rules – for instance, reporting to the Central Bank if money flows exceed certain thresholds, and ensuring such accounts abroad are only used for legitimate, declared purposes.

 

In conclusion, while a few years ago getting banking in the UAE as a crypto firm was extremely difficult, it has become manageable with the right preparation: obtain the relevant license, maintain excellent compliance, approach receptive banks with full disclosure, and use free zone support and interim fintech solutions as needed.

Persistence is key – it might involve knocking on several banks’ doors, but success is increasingly likely now that UAE’s own regulators encourage banks to engage with the crypto sector under proper oversight.



What commercial contracts and investment structures do UAE crypto and fintech businesses need?

Crypto and fintech businesses in the UAE rely on a variety of commercial contracts to operate smoothly and protect their interests. Key agreements include:

 

  • Founder and Shareholder Agreements: At the structuring stage, if there are multiple founders or if you have seed investors, a well-drafted Shareholders’ Agreement is crucial. This sets out governance (voting rights, board seats), share vesting for founders, exit rights, and what happens if a founder leaves or if more capital is needed. Given the fast pace of crypto, clauses dealing with bringing in future investors (pre-emptive rights, drag-along/tag-along rights) are important to outline. If the company is part of an accelerator or
    incubator (like those in ADGM’s RegLab or DMCC’s Crypto Centre), there may be specific agreements aligning with those programs too.
  • Customer Terms and Conditions & Privacy Policy: Any crypto exchange, trading platform, wallet, or fintech app will need robust Terms of Service for its users. Under UAE law, these terms must be clear and not deceptive, and if aimed at consumers, they should comply with consumer protection laws. Since crypto assets are involved, terms must disclaim certain risks (volatility, no government guarantee, etc.) and clarify the company’s responsibilities (for example, what happens in case of a technical glitch or hack). VARA and SCA regulations don’t dictate exact contract wording, but they do require that customers are informed of risks and that contracts aren’t misleading. Additionally, a Privacy Policy is legally required, describing how user data is collected, stored, and used – especially since these businesses handle sensitive personal and financial data. The UAE has new data protection laws (federal law and also ADGM/DIFC have their own data protection regimes) which these policies need to adhere to. For instance, if the fintech is in DIFC, it must comply with the DIFC Data Protection Law; if it’s handling data of UAE residents generally, the federal Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL) applies.
  • Service Provider Agreements: Crypto and fintech firms often rely on third- party tech providers, whether it’s cloud hosting, KYC/AML software, or liquidity providers. Contracts with these providers need to be carefully negotiated. For example, an exchange might integrate a market making service or liquidity API – the contract should cover uptime guarantees, how fees are shared, and liability if the service malfunctions. Another example is engaging a custody provider for digital assets (like a firm that holds crypto in cold storage on behalf of the exchange) – here the contract would detail security standards, insurance coverage for assets, and responsibility in the event of loss. Many UAE crypto companies also use international providers for things like blockchain analytics (Chainalysis, etc.), which involves cross-border data transfer; the agreements should address compliance with UAE data laws and confidentiality.
  • Banking and Payment Processing Agreements: If the business has a direct relationship with a payment processor or a bank for services (for instance, an exchange using a payment gateway for credit card purchases of crypto), the contract with that provider is vital. It will set the fees, settlement schedule, chargeback handling (which is a big issue if someone buys crypto with a credit card then disputes the charge), and termination clauses (you’d want notice if the processor decides to drop crypto services so you can find an alternative). In the UAE, some payment processors explicitly forbid crypto transactions unless they’ve agreed otherwise, so the contract must explicitly permit crypto activity to avoid later shut-offs.
  • Employment Contracts and Stock Option Plans: As fintech and crypto firms grow, they often want to attract talent with Employee Stock Option Plans (ESOPs) or token incentive schemes. In the UAE, you can have
    ESOPs in free zones like DIFC/ADGM fairly easily (they recognize things like stock options in their companies’ laws). However, if a company wants to reward employees with tokens instead of shares, that gets into novel territory – one must ensure that doing so doesn’t violate any token offering regulations and is clearly documented (often as a bonus scheme contingent on token
    performance, etc.). Standard employment contracts also need possibly extra clauses for crypto firms, such as confidentiality (given employees might have access to private keys or sensitive financial info), non-compete clauses (to prevent them from immediately joining a competitor or starting a copycat
    platform), and clauses dealing with intellectual property (ensuring any code or algorithms they develop belong to the company). UAE labor law (and DIFC/ADGM employment law) will apply, so contracts must give at least the minimum statutory rights (like end-of-service gratuity, leave entitlements, etc.), but beyond that, tailor to the startup’s needs.

 

When it comes to investment structures, crypto and fintech businesses often have to choose between raising funds through equity or through token sales (or a combination). The UAE, through the SCA, has a framework for Security Token Offerings (STOs) and initial coin offerings, thanks to the SCA’s 2020 Virtual Asset regulations. If a project wants to issue a token to investors in the UAE, it must either do so in one of the free zones with the regulator’s nod or through SCA’s approval if targeting the mainland. Often, startups will raise equity from VCs for initial funding (governed by standard investment agreements under UAE or English law) and then perhaps do a token issuance for their platform’s utility or as a reward mechanism.

 

Each approach has legal implications: equity investment is pretty straightforward legally (shares in a UAE holding company or a convertible note that converts to shares), whereas a token issuance might trigger compliance needs – e.g., if the token is treated as a security, you’d need to file a prospectus or get an exemption, or if it’s a pure utility token, you still need to ensure it’s not crossing into regulated territory (VARA has an Issuance Rulebook that covers when and how tokens can be issued by licensed entities ).

 

Many fintechs in the UAE also consider setting up an investment holding structure in the DIFC or ADGM to tap into their venture capital ecosystems. DIFC and ADGM have specific Venture Capital Fund regimes that make it easier to set up a fund to raise money. For a startup, this could mean they accept investment from a fund that is set up in those zones. From the startup’s perspective, the investment structure may involve a Subscription Agreement and possibly a Share Purchase Agreement if issuing new shares, or a convertible instrument (like SAFE notes adapted to UAE law). If the company is part of an international group, sometimes the investment happens at an offshore parent level with a simple agreement for future tokens (SAFT) if investors are actually buying rights to future tokens.

 

One important contract to highlight is if the crypto business is customer-facing – user asset custody agreements. If users will deposit fiat or crypto, the terms need to clarify the relationship: is it a loan to the platform? Is the platform acting as agent or trustee? For instance, some exchanges state in their terms that crypto assets remain the property of the users and the company is just the custodian; others have terms where the user lends the crypto to the company (especially if offering yield). UAE law doesn’t have a lot of precedent for crypto custody, so using clear contractual language is the main way to define these relationships and responsibilities.

 

Finally, smart contract considerations: If a part of the business logic is in a smart contract (say a DeFi protocol or an automated escrow), the legal enforceability of that needs to be addressed. The UAE has e-commerce and electronic transactions laws which generally recognize electronic records and signatures as valid. In fact, smart contracts are acknowledged as binding under UAE law (like under the Electronic Transactions Law) provided they meet certain conditions.

Nonetheless, it’s wise to have traditional contracts that complement any smart contract usage – for example, a terms of use might say “transactions executed via our smart contract are deemed final and binding, and by using it you agree to the contract’s code outcomes,” etc. This ensures that there is legal backing to what the code does.

 

In summary, a UAE crypto/fintech business will juggle a variety of contracts: internal ones (shareholder agreements, employment contracts), external commercial ones (with service providers, banks, customers), and investment agreements for fundraising. Each should be drafted or reviewed by legal counsel to ensure compliance with UAE law and alignment with the unique aspects of crypto transactions. Solid contracts help prevent disputes and regulatory issues down the line – they define rights and obligations clearly in an industry where things can evolve quickly. As the company scales or enters new partnerships, these contracts may need updates or new ones (for example, entering a liquidity sharing agreement with another exchange, or a technology licensing deal if you use or license out a trading engine). Legal services thus remain a constant need – from drafting and negotiation to ensuring the contracts stay current with laws.

How can crypto and fintech firms legally and strategically establish and operate in the UAE? (Case Studies)

The UAE has seen several crypto and fintech firms successfully navigate its regulatory environment. Let’s look at a few scenarios that highlight legal and strategic best practices:

 

  • Case Study: Global Crypto Exchange setting up in Dubai (Binance) – Binance’s expansion into the UAE is a prime example of strategic
    establishment. Rather than serving UAE users from abroad and risking regulatory action, Binance worked closely with VARA to become licensed. It set up a local entity (Binance FZE), hired compliance and operations staff on the ground, and went through VARA’s multi-stage licensing (first a provisional permit, then an MVP license, and finally a Full Market Product license). By April 2024, Binance obtained the VARA license that allows it to cater to retail clients legally in Dubai. Strategically, Binance limited certain services until approval (for instance, not offering futures trading to retail until it got the green light). Binance also reportedly partnered with local firms for fiat handling – using a local bank for customer deposits and integrating with the UAE’s KYC systems – all of which was only possible due to its licensed status. The takeaway: a phased, regulator-coordinated approach can turn a once “gray area” operation into a fully compliant business, and this opens doors – since licensing, Binance has been able to launch marketing campaigns in Dubai, hold events, and integrate with the banking system, significantly boosting its user engagement in the region.
  • Case Study: Regional Fintech Startup (Liv.) – Liv. is a digital-only bank (a fintech app) launched by Emirates NBD a few years back. While not a crypto company, it’s a fintech that shows how to navigate UAE’s banking regulations innovatively. Liv. operated under Emirates NBD’s banking license but was run as a separate app with its own brand targeting millennials for quick account opening and personal finance features. The lesson here for fintechs is that partnership with an incumbent can be a viable strategy – if getting your own license is cumbersome, you might work with a bank under a BIN sponsorship or fintech collaboration model. We see this happening in crypto too: for example, some crypto wallet providers in the UAE have
    partnered with Mashreq Bank’s NeoPay for issuing prepaid cards, effectively leveraging Mashreq’s license to provide financial services. The legal underpinning was a commercial agreement and possibly a revenue share, rather than the startup itself holding a license for every service.
  • Case Study: MidChains (ADGM) – Institutional Exchange – MidChains chose ADGM as its base and became one of the first fully regulated exchanges there. Legally, it structured itself as an ADGM company and complied with FSRA’s requirements from the outset. This included appointing a UAE-resident CEO and compliance officer, setting up its technology to meet FSRA’s security standards, and limiting its offerings initially to spot trading of a few major cryptocurrencies to institutional and accredited investors.
    Strategically, this positioning helped MidChains gain trust – notably, it received investment from Mubadala (the sovereign fund) which wouldn’t have been possible if MidChains wasn’t thoroughly regulated. MidChains also strategically focused on a niche (safe, regulated trading for big players) rather than trying to be everything at once. By doing so, it avoided regulatory pitfalls
    and slowly expanded its services (they later looked into a retail app once they had proven the model in a controlled way ). This case shows that aligning your business plan with the regulator’s comfort zone (in ADGM’s case,
    starting with well-understood assets and known investor profiles) can be a recipe for success in the UAE. It builds a track record that can then be leveraged to broaden the business.
  • Case Study: Crypto Fund in DIFC – Suppose a crypto asset management firm set up in DIFC (we’ll call it “Alpha Capital”). Alpha Capital obtained a DFSA license to manage assets, and got approval to include crypto tokens in
    its investment scope under the DFSA’s regime. Legally, it structured itself as a DIFC company with two experienced principals who the DFSA approved as Licensed Directors. It established strong custody solutions for clients by contracting with a European regulated custodian that the DFSA had no objection to. Strategically, Alpha Capital targeted institutional clients in the region (family offices, high-net-worth individuals) who were curious about crypto but wanted the reassurance of a locally regulated manager. By offering managed portfolios of Bitcoin/Ether and other DFSA-recognized tokens, under the oversight of the DFSA, it provided a product that these conservative investors could be comfortable with. Alpha Capital also set up a feeder fund in the Cayman Islands (common for fund structures) but kept the investment management in DIFC for credibility. This dual structure (offshore fund, onshore manager) is common and legal, as long as the DIFC manager discloses everything to DFSA and only deals with professional clients. The success of Alpha Capital demonstrates that the UAE’s legal frameworks can accommodate crypto investment products, and with the right structure (fund vehicle, custody, insurance, etc.), a firm can tap into the large pools of capital in the UAE. It also shows the importance of jurisdictional arbitrage: using an offshore for the fund product while using DIFC for the management/regulation – taking advantage of each jurisdiction’s strengths.
  • Case Study: DMCC Crypto Centre Startup – Let’s consider a blockchain gaming startup that set up in DMCC Crypto Centre (“GameCoin LLC”). GameCoin doesn’t deal with fiat directly; it’s building a play-to-earn game with an in-game token. They chose DMCC for ease of setup – legally, they obtained a DMCC crypto trading license (proprietary trading in crypto- commodities) which allowed them to issue their token and list it on exchanges outside the UAE. They didn’t need a VARA license because they were not serving as an exchange or broker in Dubai – they were creating a platform and token economy (and any token sales they did were outside UAE or to accredited investors). However, DMCC’s oversight and the SCA’s involvement meant they had to have their smart contract audited and they voluntarily committed to AML checks for any token buyers referred by UAE channels. Strategically, GameCoin used the DMCC base to access UAE resources (talent, accelerators, events) but aimed their product globally. They kept an eye on VARA’s evolving rules, and when VARA announced it would regulate issuance of tokens that target Dubai residents, GameCoin made sure not to market heavily to Dubai gamers until they either obtained a VARA clearance or limited such access. This shows a strategic compliance mindset – even if not directly regulated by VARA, they proactively stayed within the spirit of the law to avoid issues. As the project grew, they attracted a major UAE-based investor, and that investor’s condition was that they eventually move to VARA or ADGM if they wanted to launch an exchange for their tokens or offer a wallet to UAE users. This kind of staged approach (start in a lighter regime like DMCC, then graduate to VARA/ADGM as the business expands) is quite common.

 

 

Lessons and Best Practices: These cases illustrate a few key points for crypto/fintech firms in the UAE:

 

  • Regulatory Engagement: Firms that engage early and often with regulators (VARA, FSRA, DFSA, SCA) fare better. Whether it’s through formal applications or sandboxes or even informal consultations, being on the regulators’ radar as a serious, compliant player can smooth the path. The UAE regulators are generally open to innovation if approached transparently.
  • Choose the Right Jurisdiction for Your Stage: A small startup might start in a free zone with fewer barriers, whereas a scaling company might go for a full VARA license. Understanding the nuances (as we detailed earlier) and possibly using a combination (offshore + onshore) can optimize both compliance and business operations.
  • Local Partnerships: Many successes involve partnerships – be it a bank partnership for fiat access, a corporate partnership (like a telecom or airline
    using a crypto payment solution – e.g., Etisalat’s Smiles app integrating crypto rewards via a fintech partner), or an incubator/accelerator partnership. UAE has a culture of public-private collaboration. A crypto fintech tying up with, say, a government initiative (like the UAE Blockchain Strategy) gains legitimacy and support. We saw this with startups that partnered with UAE exchange houses to pilot crypto remittances under controlled environments.
  • Governance and Team: The cases show that having a strong local team (resident executives, reputable advisors) is important. For Binance, hiring former regulators or banking executives in its UAE team helped reassure VARA. For MidChains, having a pedigree team gave ADGM comfort. The human factor shouldn’t be underestimated – UAE authorities often want to know who is behind a company. A strategy for new firms is to assemble a board of advisors with UAE financial industry experience or even to include an Emirati partner (not by law, but for guidance and networking).
  • Cross-Referencing Legal Expertise: Lastly, successful firms use law firms not just for one-off tasks but as ongoing counsel. They often have to interpret new laws (like VARA’s rulebooks which are new) and ensure contracts and operations align. For instance, when VARA issued its marketing guidelines in 2022 banning promotion of unlicensed crypto, every crypto firm had to quickly review their marketing contracts and social media campaigns – those with good legal support adjusted in time and avoided penalties.

 

In conclusion, crypto and fintech firms can absolutely establish and thrive in the UAE by leveraging the country’s progressive regulations, choosing their licensing jurisdiction wisely, maintaining strong compliance and governance, and forging the right partnerships. The UAE government actively wants to be a global crypto hub, so the door is open – it’s up to each firm to step through in a compliant, strategic manner. With the right legal advice and business strategy, the UAE offers a fertile ground for crypto exchanges, blockchain projects, payment startups, and more. For specific guidance on crypto-to-fiat transactional issues such as banking integration and compliance, see our related article Crypto-Fiat Transaction Legal Support in the UAE, which complements this discussion.

Related Practice Areas

Have a legal query?

Let’s talk solutions. Tell us what you need.

Back to top